Bottom line
Judge Mikel Lupisella is an Administrative Law Judge at the MT Pleasant MI hearing office who decided 360 disability cases in the most recent full fiscal year (FY2025), approving 69.4% — about 11.2 points above the 58.3% national average. Across 8 years of available data (FY2018–FY2025, 836 decisions), the approval rate has ranged from 0.0% (FY2021) to 69.4% (FY2025), for a lifetime approval rate of 60.2%. Past approval rates describe patterns, not predictions: your outcome depends on your medical evidence, your testimony, and your preparation — which is exactly why, in front of a favorable judge, preparation and representation carry more weight, not less.
Approval rate over time
Judge Lupisella's approval rate by fiscal year (FY2018–FY2025), compared with the national average. Annual rates move with case mix; the long-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision breakdown
| Outcome | Judge Lupisella | MT Pleasant MI office | National |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approved | 69.4% | 66.4% | 58.3% |
| Denied | 30.6% | 33.6% | 41.7% |
| Dismissed (of dispositions) | 10.0% | — | — |
Approval rate = fully + partially favorable decisions ÷ total decisions, excluding dismissals. Dismissal rate is shown as a share of all dispositions.
How Judge Mikel Lupisella decides cases
In the most recent full fiscal year, Judge Mikel Lupisella approved 69.4% of decided cases, against a 66.4% MT Pleasant MI office average and a 58.3% national average. The fully favorable rate of 63.3% means that when this judge approves, the award is usually fully favorable rather than partial. Combined with a relatively low dismissal rate (10.0% of dispositions), the docket profile suggests a judge who decides cases on the record. Over FY2018–FY2025, the rate has ranged from 0.0% to 69.4% and has risen most recently — the long-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Preparing for a hearing with Judge Lupisella
These fundamentals apply to any ALJ hearing — and matter more in front of a judge whose approval rate sits near or above the national average:
- 1Bring a longitudinal treating-physician record. Consistent notes spanning your disability period beat any single exam. One month of records is rarely enough.
- 2Don't rely on a consultative exam alone. If your file is built around a one-time CE, expect detailed questioning. Add treating-source statements.
- 3Prepare for daily-activity questions. Honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that contradict your medical record — in either direction — hurt credibility.
- 4Expect vocational-expert testimony. A VE will testify about jobs someone with your limitations could do. Your Disability Representative should be ready to cross-examine.
- 5Know your exhibit file. Review everything SSA has before the hearing; missing records are the most common preventable problem.
Why representation matters
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37 (population-wide average; individual outcomes vary). Of claimants who win at ALJ hearings, the large majority had representation.
No consultation fee. No upfront cost. Fee is a percentage of back pay only, capped by federal law — nothing unless you win.
Free · Confidential · No fee unless you win
About the MT Pleasant MI hearing office
Judge Lupisella is one of 8 Administrative Law Judges at the MT Pleasant MI hearing office, which approves about 66.4% of decided cases office-wide. Case assignment is effectively random — you cannot choose your judge, which is why office-level context matters.
Other judges at MT Pleasant MI
Frequently asked questions
Methodology
Statistics on this page are derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration's Office of Hearings Operations public disposition data. Approval rate is calculated as fully plus partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, excluding dismissals. National and office averages are pooled from the same dataset. These figures describe historical decision patterns for a reporting period and are not predictions of any individual case outcome. Disability Path is not a law firm and is not affiliated with the Social Security Administration.